INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
Scope and policy
PERSPECTIVA EDUCACIONAL(PE) is an interdisciplinary journal that receives research and theoretical articles on educational problems at various levels (Early Childhood, Elementary, Middle, and Secondary School, and Higher Education) and modalities of the system, tending to expand frontiers of knowledge in education. To that end, the journal focuses on five lines of research: Curriculum and Evaluation; Teaching and Learning for the co-construction of knowledge; Culture, Policy and Leadership of educational organizations; Inclusion, citizenship and diversity; and Teacher Education.
PERSPECTIVA EDUCACIONAL has periodically published since 1980 until 2007. This process was paused with the purpose of transform it into a new format, allowing a greater visibility and coverage, nationally and internationally. As a consequence, our journal reappears in November 2010 with renewed, online publication, providing an easier way to review the articles and establishing a specialized mean of dissemination about pre- and in-service teacher education.
This journal only receives original papers without being simultaneously sent to other journals. Until 2016, two annual issues were published, in January (31) and June (30). Since 2017, starts the publication of three issues per year, in the months of January (31), June (30) and October (31).
The journal is intended for researchers, teachers, and professionals in the field of education. This contributes to: the development of teacher's training processes, the proposal of new lines of thought, pursuing the exchange of investigation results and the discussion of ideas in the field of education. In addition to the above, this journal aims mainly to the initial and continual teacher's training process.
Form and preparation of manuscripts
PERSPECTIVA EDUCACIONAL will receive articles that correspond to theoretical or empirical works in the area of teacher education. Among these type of works we include: scientific research articles and theoretical-reflective articles about current and relevant topics pertaining to the teacher education field. Articles should not have been submitted simultanously to other journals for their review. The period for article submission is open year-round and the following rules apply:
Articles must be unpublished, writen in spanish or english, formatted in letter size, with arial 11 font and 1.5 of line spacing, with regular margins (2.5 cms top and bottom and 3 cms. left and right) with justified alingment. It must present a summary and abstract of 150 words and a maximum of 5 keywords. The title must be writen in spanish and english. The bibliographical references must be at least 30 of which 50% must correspond to the last 5 years.
The first page must include:
Articles must present the following structure:
At the time of submitting the article to the journal’s platform, the author must attach the following to the attached files section, according to the indicated format: copyright release form, resume, originality statement, and document with suggestion of three potential article reviewers.
Finally, Perspectiva Educacional reserves its right to edit the style of the articles, according to the editorial decisions of the journal.
Sending of manuscripts
Perspectiva Educacional, submits all articles to a rigorous process that considers the following phases:
Initial review: The editorial team makes an initial review of the manuscript, ensuring its thematic relevance and compliance with the formal criteria established by the journal. If the editorial team determines that the manuscript meets the minimum criteria for continued review, a co-editor is assigned to review the authors' suggestion for reviewers and determine two blind reviewers to begin the review process. If the article does not meet the criteria of thematic relevance, novelty, and editorial standards, the article is rejected.
External peers blind assessment: The two assigned blind evaluators complete the respective evaluation guideline (theoretical or research article), through the platform of the Journal.
The evaluation concludes with a report that indicates whether a manuscript is: Accepted, Needs minor corrections, Needs major corrections or Rejected. In the evaluation format, peers are asked to: a) indicate whether or not the criteria of form and content have been met, b) Make a general evaluation of the article, including suggestions and/or contributions.
If there are discrepancies between the opinions of the evaluators, the manuscript is sent to a third evaluator and with this third opinion, the editorial committee takes the decision to reject or send the article for modification.
The evaluators correspond to academic experts in the subject, external to the editorial committee and, preferably, from countries of a different geographical location from that of the authors of the article.
Second version of the manuscript: Based on the observations and contributions of the peer reviewers, the editorial manager prepares a document that gathers the suggestions and eliminates all information that allows them to be identified. This document entitled Evaluation Letter is sent to the authors, who decide whether to send a new version of their manuscript, considering the comments of the evaluators or if they abandon the process. If the authors decide to send the new version in order to continue the evaluation process, the editorial manager assigns a sending date according to the magnitude of the observations and modifications to be made by the author(s) (date that fluctuates between 2 and 3 weeks). If the authors decide not to continue in the process, the manuscript is removed from the journal's database and the evaluators are informed that there will be no new versions for evaluation.
In case the article is rejected by the evaluators, the author(s) is informed through a letter in which the suggestions made by the evaluators are sent.
In addition to the second version of the manuscript, a letter of response to the evaluators must be sent in attached files, in which the modifications made according to the suggestions indicated by the external peers are based.
Second round review: The editorial manager receives a new version of the article and the reply letter to the evaluators, documents that are sent to the assigned co-editor for a review on compliance with the formal aspects regulated by the Journal. Then, both documents are sent to the external evaluators of the first version, in order to check if the adjustments suggested by them were considered by the author(s). Based on this, each evaluator evaluates the new manuscript and indicates to the editor if it is necessary to make new modifications or if it considers that the article can already be published.
Final decision: Once the co-editor receives the new evaluations from the peer evaluators, together with the editor-in-chief, the overall evaluation of the manuscript is analyzed to determine whether the article is approved or rejected.
When the evaluators consider that it is still necessary to adjust the manuscript, the editorial manager prepares a new document with the evaluations, taking care of the anonymity of the experts, and sends it to the authors. The previous process is repeated until the evaluators consider that the manuscript can be published. This prepares the final version.
Edition: An article acceptance letter is sent and the editing process begins. In this step, minor style and translation corrections are made. Finally, the article is sent to layout.
Publication: The publication of the article is scheduled and thank you letters are sent to external evaluators.
Authors have all the specifications for publication
on the journal's website for compliance with their manuscript, as well
as the description of the submission process through the OJS platform.
[About the journal] [Editorial board] [Subscription]
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
El Bosque N° 1290
Sausalito, Viña del Mar
Valparaíso - Chile
Tel.: (56-32) 2274720