SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número2STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION OF LIGNAN COMPOUNDS ISOLATED FROM NECTANDRA SPECIES (LAURACEAE)CONFIRMATION OF DEOXYNIV ALENOL PRESENCE IN CHILEAN WHEAT BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society

versión On-line ISSN 0717-9707

J. Chil. Chem. Soc. vol.62 no.2 Concepción jun. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072017000200002 

 

SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF IRON IONS FROM HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTIONS

 

RAMA FAROUQ 1*,YEHIA SELIM 1

1 Petrochemical Engineering Department, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt (+203)3877200, (+203)3877400, (+203)3877212, (+203)3877214; Canal El mahmoudeya St. Semouha, Alexandria, Egypt.
* e-mail address: rania.farouq@pua.edu.eg


Abstract

In this study Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK) and acetophenone (Methyl Phenyl Ketone) are presented as suitable agents for removal of Fe(III) from concentrated hydrochloric acid solutions.

An extensive study applying 4 parameters was carried out: Time (5, 10,15,20,30 and 60 minutes), Stirring rate (200, 300, 400 and 500 r.p.m), Solvent to HCl Ratio (5%, 10%, 14% and 16%), and initial concentration of Fe ions in crude HCl (95.24, 126 ppm, 330 ppm and 1955 ppm).The best Condition was found to be 30 min - 400 r.p.m - 14 %.

The distilled water was used to strip Fe ions out of MIBK; In order to get most of the MIBK dissolved in both the concentrated HCl and water. Diluents were used such as benzene, kerosene and xylene. Xylene gives better recovery of about 96%.

Key words: Fe(III); Solvation mechanism; Hydrochloric acid; MIBK ;acetophenone


 

1. INTRODUCCIÓN

Heavy metal pollution is a serious environmental problem. Iron ions are one of the heavy metals that cause serious problems in the aqueous streams especially at high levels concentration [1]

Iron (III) is present in the solutions after hydrometallurgical processes of recovering a number of nonferrous metal ions. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) enriched with iron ions is produced during the synthesis of PVC; hence has lower value than traditional hydrochloric acid. In order to produce high purity hydrochloric acid; an effective means to remove it from the pregnant solutions is often Desirable. [2]

Traditional processes used for treating effluents with heavy metals, include: ion exchange, reverse osmosis, chemical coagulation and precipitation, ultrafiltration, and adsorption. [3-6]

It was found that the adsorption process can be effective in heavy metal removal. In addition to that, the natural adsorbents are environmental friend, existent in large quantities and have good adsorption properties. [7-8]

From literature it was found that solvent extraction and ion exchange are being employed for iron control. [9-10] However solvent extraction processes have become major purification operations in practice [11-13] There are a few research reports on the use of a solvent extraction approach to recover Fe (III) from chloride solutions; the solvent includes various amines and quaternary ammonium salts; Extraction using immiscible solvents containing carbonyl group or Polyethers give very good results but it dissolves to higher rate starting from 6 N concentrations hydrochloric acid. [14-19]

The present work examines the possibility of iron (III) separation from hydrochloric acid solution by solvent extraction using MIBK at various initial metal concentrations and MIBK ratios.

2.  CHEMICALS & REAGENTS

All chemicals were used as delivered without any purification.

Two liquids, i.e.,MIBK (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone: 4-Methyl 2- Pentanone) From SDFCL s d fine chemicals (India) Assay: 99.0 min. Sp.Gr. : 0.80 g/ml and acetophenone (Methyl Phenyl Ketone From Alpha chemicals. Assay: 98% min. Sp.Gr:1.026; were used as metal ion carriers in solvent extraction; benzene, kerosene and xylene as diluents. MIBK was used as 10, 12, 14 and 16 vol. % solution.

The spent acid was a yellow solution with the concentration 11 M and iron concentration range from 95 to 1955 mg/L

3.  LIQUID—LIQUID EXTRACTION PROCEDURE

Extraction was carried out in a typical way: aqueous sample, containing metal ions in 11 M HCl were mechanically shaken with MIBK for different time periods at (25±1°C) and then transferred into glass separator funnels and then allowed to stand for phase separation of suitable volume.

Scrubbing of loaded MIBK, was carried out with deionized water. Stripping was carried out four times consecutively using fresh water each time. Aqueous phases after each stage were taken for analysis.

Benzene, kerosene and xylene were applied as diluents. All tests were carried out at room temperature (25±1°C) to eliminate any temperature effects.

Percentage extraction (E) was calculated from the contents of metal ions in the aqueous Phases before (Co) and after (C) extraction:

Concentrations of iron ions in the organic phase were calculated from mass balance taking into account the change of phase volume, if necessary:

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Batch experiments of liquid-liquid extraction of Fe (III) were carried out to verify transport of the iron species with MIBK and acetophenone.

4.1. Effect of different time intervals on % extraction

The percentage extractions of the Fe3+ ion from the high-level (125 ppm) aqueous solution for different time periods of MIBK are given in Table 1.

 

Table 1. Percentage extraction of Fe ions
at different time period of MIBK.

 

As shown from table increasing the time from 30 to 60 min has slight effect on % extraction; so time 20 was chosen as optimum time period.

4.2. Effect of different MIBK ratios

The percentage extraction of the Fe3+ ion from the high-level (125 ppm) aqueous solution using different concentrations of MIBK (10,12,14 and 16%) at constant contact time 15 and 60 min are given in Table 2.

 

Table 2. Percentage extraction of Fe ions using
different MIBK ratios.

 

It is observed that from the MIBK ratio of 12% that the extraction is nearly constant; However MIBK ratio of 14% was chosen as optimum concentration.

4.3. Effect of different stirring speed

The Percentage extractions of the Fe3+ ion from the high-level (125ppm) aqueous solution for different stirring speed of MIBK are given in Table 3.

 

Table 3. Percentage extraction of Fe ions at
different stirring speed with
MIBK.

 

As shown from table increasing the R.P.M from 100 to 400 increases % extraction then decreases; so time 400 R.P.M was chosen as optimum speed of agitation.

4.4. Effect of initial concentrations of iron (III)

As shown from table 4 increasing the initial concentrations of iron (III) from 95.24 to 1955 ppm has increased % extraction.

 

Table 4. Percentage extraction at different
initial concentrations of iron (III).

 

4.5. Effect of the diluents on the extraction of iron (III)

In order to get most of the MIBK dissolved in both Conc. HCl and water we used diluents such as kerosene, Benzene and Xylene. Table 5 shows the percent of iron (III) carried out in several combinations of the MIBK and the diluent.

 

Table 5. Percentage extraction of different combinations
of the MIBK and the diluents.

 

By comparing total volume of the solvent with the different diluents, it is observed that Xylene gives better recovery of about 96% of MIBK with high percent of extraction.

4.6. Comparison of the extraction of iron (III) using Acetophenone and MIBK

Two successive extraction-stripping stages were carried out with MIBK and Acetophenone using fresh aqueous solutions of about 2000 mg/L Fe (III) in HCl 11 M.

As shown from Table 6 MIBK extraction is slightly higher than for Acetophenone for iron (III) concentration about 2000 mg/L HCl. Therefore, the substitution of MIBK with acetophenone, as an iron (III) extractant from hydrochloric acid solutions, seems to be useless. Moreover, acetophenone is more expensive than MIBK.

 

Table 6. The extraction of iron (III) using
Acetophenone and MIBK.

 

4.7. Extractant re-utilization

In order to collect information on the stability of the MIBK for the adopted experimental conditions, four successive extraction-stripping stages were carried out with MIBK, using fresh aqueous solutions of a 95.24mg/L Fe (III) in HCl 11 M. The results obtained for the Fe (III) extraction in each stage, Fig. 1. Clearly denote that the re-utilization of the MIBK is feasible, since no significant decrease of Fe (III) extraction is observed after the successive contacts. A similar behavior is expected for the acetophenone extractant described in this work as shown in Fig. 2.

 

Fig.1. Fe (III) extraction from HCl in four successive
extraction-water stripping stages by MIBK.

 

Fig. 2. Fe (III) extraction from HCl in four successive
extraction-water stripping stages by acetophenone.

 

5. CONCLUSION

The solvent extraction of iron (III) was carried out from hydrochloric acid media using MIBK and acetophenone. Both solvents can be successfully used for removing iron(III) ions from aqueous solution. The maximum removal percentages of iron(III) ions using both solvents are achieved within the first 20 min. The removal percentages of iron(III) ions increase sharply by increasing solvent ratios up to 14%. As the initial concentration of ions increases the percentage removal using MIBK increases at stirring speed 400 r.p.m.

Using Xylene as solvent stripper giving better result than benzene but it is more expensive.

 

REFERENCES

1. Al-Anber M., Removal of high-level Fe3+ from aqueous solution using natural inorganic materials: Bentonite (NB) and quartz (NQ), Desalination 2010;250 885-891        [ Links ]

2. Jafari A. and John Donaldson D, Determination of HCl and VOC Emission from Thermal Degradation of PVC in the Absence and Presence of Copper, Copper(II) Oxide and Copper(II) Chloride, E-Journal of Chemistry 2009; 6(3); 685-692        [ Links ]

3. Chaturvedi S, Dave P, Removal of iron for safe drinking water, Desalination 2012 ; 303 1-11        [ Links ]

4. M.F. SanRoma'n, I. OrtizGa'ndara, R. Ibañez, I. Ortiz , Hybrid membrane process for the recovery of major components (zinc, iron and HCl) from spent pickling effluents, Journal of Membrane Science 2012;415-416 616-623        [ Links ]

5. Cieszynska A, Wisniewski M, Selective extraction of palladium(II) from hydrochloric acid solutions with phosphonium extractants, Separation and Purification Technology 2011 ;80; 385-389        [ Links ]

6. Niemczewska J, Cierpiszewski R, Szymanowski J, Mass transfer of zinc(II) extraction from hydrochloric acid solution in the Lewis cell, Desalination 2004; 162 169-177        [ Links ]

7. El-Zahhar A, Sharaf El-Deen S, Sheha R, Sorption of iron from phosphoric acid solution using polyacrylamide grafted activated carbon, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2013; 290-299        [ Links ]

8. Navarro R, Gallardo V, Saucedo I, E. Guibal, Extraction of Fe(III) from hydrochloric acid solutions using Amberlite XAD-7 resin impregnated with trioctylphosphine oxide (Cyanex 921), Hydrometallurgy 2009 ;98 257-266        [ Links ]

9. Lee M, Nicol M, Removal of iron from cobalt sulfate solutions by ion exchange with Diphonix resin and enhancement of iron elution with titanium(III), Hydrometallurgy 2007; 86 6-12        [ Links ]

10. Regel-Rosocka M, Nowak L, Wis'niewski M, Removal of zinc (II) and iron ions from chloride solutions with phosphonium ionic liquids, Separation and Purification Technology 2012; 97 158-163.         [ Links ]

11. Sayar N, Filiz M, Sayar A, Extraction of Zn(II) from aqueous hydrochloric acid solutions into Alamine 336-m-xylene systems. Modeling considerations to predict optimum operational conditions, Hydrometallurgy 2007;86 27-36        [ Links ]

12. Kinoshita T, Akita S, Nii S, Kawaizumi F, Takahashi K, Solvent extraction of gallium with non-ionic surfactants from hydrochloric acid solution and its application to metal recovery from zinc refinery residues, Separation and Purification Technology 2004; 37 127-133        [ Links ]

13. Baba A, Adekola F, Solvent extraction of Pb(II) and Zn(II) from a Nigerian galena ore leach liquor by tributylphosphate and bis(2,4,4 trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid, Journal of King Saud University - Science 2013; 25, 297-305        [ Links ]

14. Hariharan A, Sudhakar Ch, and Venkateswara Rao B, Solvent extraction of Iron (III) with Tetra butyl ammonium bromide from aqueous acid solutions, International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2013; 3(3): 78-81        [ Links ]

15. Paiva A, Costa M, Application of N,NV-tetrasubstituted malonamides to the recovery of iron(III) from chloride solutions, Hydrometallurgy 77 (2005)103-108        [ Links ]

16. Grzeszczyk A, Regel-Rosocka M, Extraction of zinc(II), iron(II) and iron(III) from chloride media with dibutylbutylphosphonate, Hydrometallurgy 2007; 86 72-79        [ Links ]

17. Xiaomei Wang, Bin Liang, Li Lü, Pan Wu, Chun Li, Jin Ma, Simultaneous oxidation and extraction of iron from simulated ilmenite hydrochloric acid leachate], Hydrometallurgy 2012; 129-130 105-110        [ Links ]

18. Rabah M, Recovery of iron and copper from spent HCl used to clean up dirty car radiators, Hydrometallurgy 2000; 56.75-92        [ Links ]

19. Baba A, Adekola F, Arodola O, Ibrahim L, Bale R, Ghosh M, Sheik A Simultaneous Recovery Of Total Iron And Titanium From Ilmenite Ore By Hydrometallurgical Processing, Metall. Mater. Eng. 2012; Vol 18 (1) p. 67-78.         [ Links ]

20. Rydberg J, Solvent Extraction Principles and Practice, Revised and Expanded, CRC Press, 2004        [ Links ]

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons