SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41Doctrina puerorum y exceptio doli. Una discusión sobre estrategias interpretativasCausae credendi y obligatio re contracta en las res cottidianae índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos

versão impressa ISSN 0716-5455

Resumo

MEDINA VILLANUEVA, Jorge Eduardo. Victim Fault And Comparative Negligence: Explanation Of A Historical Confusion In The Light Of Roman Writings. Rev. estud. hist.-juríd. [online]. 2019, n.41, pp.69-86. ISSN 0716-5455.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-54552019000100069.

Since Roman times the legal consequence arising from the idea that the victim somehow contributed to their own harmwas that his/her right to be indemnified was completely ruled out. As of the 18th and 19th century, based on Roman writings, it was thought that this was due to the “comparative negligence”, that is, compensating between faults, repealing one another. We consider this is an inaccurate historical interpretation of the Roman sources, which we will demonstrate herein

Palavras-chave : Victim Fault; comparative negligence; civil liability; Lex Aquilia.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )