SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número68Casi siempre con razón, casi siempre mal leído. Las Reglas del Método de DurkheimFundamentación teórica de la propuesta metodológica de Norman Fairclough e Isabela Fairclough índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Cinta de moebio

versión On-line ISSN 0717-554X

Resumen

ARNOLD, Marcelo; PIGNUOLI, Sergio  y  THUMALA, Daniela. Systemic social sciences and the coronavirus pandemic. Cinta moebio [online]. 2020, n.68, pp.167-180. ISSN 0717-554X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2020000200167.

Given the multiplicity of perspectives that accompany the observation of the current pandemic, becomes relevant to identify those that achieve the greatest resonance. Thus, it is observed how citizens and decision makers have increased their demands for valid information by applying rationality, methods, and procedures of science in an exponential manner. In this paper we develop a synthetic set of selected guidelines on how the current pandemic is approached from systemic social sciences, and then present some of their proposals regarding the conditions, at the organizational level, which could enable the achievement of the levels of dialogue and cooperation required to address the current pandemic.

Palabras clave : covid 19; social systems; risk; organizations; institutional design.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )