SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.66 número5TRATAMIENTO LAPAROSCÓPICO DE LA OBSTRUCCIÓN INTESTINAL POR BRIDASSOBREVIDA DE PACIENTES CON CÁNCER GÁSTRICO ETAPAS IIIC Y IV SOMETIDOS A CIRUGÍA: PARTE II DE ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO 2004-2012 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista chilena de cirugía

versión On-line ISSN 0718-4026

Resumen

BELTRAN S, Marcelo A et al. Performance of Boey score and physiologic Portsmouth-POSSUM in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Rev Chil Cir [online]. 2014, vol.66, n.5, pp.443-450. ISSN 0718-4026.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-40262014000500008.

Introduction: Surgical scores such as Boey and physiologic Portsmouth-POSSUM have been independently applied to patients with perforated ulcer to stratify their surgical risk. However, there are no studies comparing both scores. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of Boey score and Portsmouth-POSSUM in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed including 108 consecutive patients older than 15-years submitted to emergency surgery from January 2002 to June 2012. Patients operated on for perforated gastric cancer were excluded. The primary outcome measure was to compare the performance of Portsmouth-POSSUM and Boey score. Secondary outcome measures were to determine cutoff points for Portsmouth-POSSUM, Boey score, C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cells (WBC) count, to predict patients at risk for complications. Results: The best cutoff point for CRP was 37.5 mg/l, and for WBC was 11.600 mm3 (OR 2.9 and 4.4). The best cutoff point for physiologic Portsmouth-POSSUM was 14, for surgical Portsmouth-POSSUM were 12, and for predictive Portsmouth-POSSUM was 0.8%. A time of perforation higher than 24 h had an OR of 35, and Boey score of 3 had an OR of 38.3. When Boey score was 2, with preoperative shock and time of perforation higher than 24 h being the positive variables, the OR was 194.3. Conclusions: Boey score performed better than Portsmouth-POSSUM, remaining a more specific score to stratify patients submitted to emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Palabras clave : Perforated peptic ulcer; Boey score; Portsmouth-POSSUM.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons