SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8 número2LAS LIMITACIONES A LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALESLAS GARANTÍAS JUDICIALES COMO VÍAS DE TUTELA DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN ESTADOS DE EMERGENCIA (IN) CONSTITUCIONAL índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Estudios constitucionales

versión On-line ISSN 0718-5200

Resumen

GALDAMEZ ZELADA, Liliana. Judicial protection of the serious violations of human rights: proceedings of the court and omissions of Chilean legislature. Estudios constitucionales [online]. 2010, vol.8, n.2, pp.201-246. ISSN 0718-5200.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002010000200008.

If the inapplicability of amnesty and statute limitation in the case of forced disappearance, torture and extralegal executions has indeed established itself as a dominant criterion of national jurisprudence, this consensus has not been attained as regards extracontractual responsibility derived from these crimes, nor in respect of the punishment dealt to those responsible. The developments brought about by judges, the dogmatic problems which have been avoided and the areas where swinging criteria still apply, can be analyzed from diverse perspectives, some of which have yet to be explored in depth by the doctrine. In this piece of work special attention will be paid to the problems set out by the legislative authority in order to develop general norms in this area and the consequences of their inactivity in dealing with the rights in question.

Palabras clave : Serious violations of human rights; Amnesty; Statute limitation; Legal penal principle; Legislative omissions.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons