SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.79 issue3Seed soaking with Bacillus sp. strain HX-2 alleviates negative effects of drought stress on maize seedlingsEffects of gibberellic acid on water uptake and germination of sweet sorghum seeds under salinity stress author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Chilean journal of agricultural research

On-line version ISSN 0718-5839

Abstract

MERINO, Jorge; PEDREROS, Alberto; FISCHER, Susana  and  LOPEZ, María D.. Critical period of weed interference on total polyphenol content in quinoa. Chil. j. agric. res. [online]. 2019, vol.79, n.3, pp.405-414. ISSN 0718-5839.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392019000300405.

There is limited information about the critical period of weed interference (CPWI) in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and the effect produced by the weed-crop interaction in secondary metabolite accumulation. The objective of the present study was to determine the CPWI and its effect on total polyphenol content in quinoa. The experiments were conducted during two consecutive seasons using a randomized complete block design with 16 treatments consisting of 8 weed growth periods and 8 weed-free growth periods in which weed population and biomass were evaluated; productive parameters, yield components, and total polyphenols were determined in the quinoa crop. Grain number per plant affected yield because of weed interference (P < 0.05), which decreased from 4312 to 162 grains plant-1 in weed growth periods and increased from 181 to 5110 grains plant-1 in weed-free growth periods. Total polyphenol content was affected by stress from weed interference (P < 0.05), which increased from 2.2 gallic acid equivalents (GAE) g-1 to 3.6 mg GAE g-1 in weed growth periods and decreased from 3.6 GAE g-1 to 1.9 mg GAE g-1 in weed-free growth periods, while the population remained constant (P > 0.05). The CPWI was determined between the phenological stages of two true leaves to flowering; therefore, the quinoa crop must remain weed-free between these two phenological stages to rule out production losses greater than 5%

Keywords : Chenopodium quinoa; critical period of weed interference; stress from weed interference; total polyphenols; weed control in quinoa.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )