SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número41La nueva agravante penal de discriminación: Los "delitos de odio"El multiculturalismo y los derechos colectivos en el primer constitucionalismo iberoamericano índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista de derecho (Valparaíso)

versión On-line ISSN 0718-6851

Resumen

ANDALUZ VEGACENTENO, Horacio. Argumentation, Arbitration and Arbitrariness: The Contradictions of the Constitutional Tribunal in the Direct Recourse of Nullity Against Rulings. Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso [online]. 2013, n.41, pp.311-339. ISSN 0718-6851.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-68512013000200009.

This article analyzes a ruling of the Bolivian Constitutional Tribunal from the point of view of the argumentation of the court rulings. In the ruling, the Tribunal stated that the request for contractual nullity was not a matter of arbitration. This article is not focused on the grounds of this assertion, but on its implications with respect to the precedents of same Constitutional Tribunal. In this regard, the article concludes that, to hand down the ruling in question, the Tribunal violated its own precedents for the direct recourse of nullity (which is the specific recourse that resulted in said ruling) about the legality of submitting requests for contractual nullity to arbitration and regarding the judicial production of the law. Since this ruling is contrary to its own precedents, it is an arbitrary ruling, giving rise to this article.

Palabras clave : Arbitration; Judicial motivation; Public order; Contractual nullity.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons