SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 número2Experiencia preliminar: STENT MGUARD en angioplastía coronaria con alta carga trombótica, ¿una nueva alternativa en protección embólica? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista chilena de cardiología

versión On-line ISSN 0718-8560

Resumen

BAEZA, Ricardo et al. Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Clinical usefulness compared to conventional coronary angiography.. Rev Chil Cardiol [online]. 2010, vol.29, n.2, pp.171-176. ISSN 0718-8560.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-85602010000200001.

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a non invasive and non ionizing imaging tool that allows a complete cardiovascular evaluation. One of its advantages is the ability to analyze myocardial perfusión with and without stress.   Aim: To show our experience using stress perfusión CMR (SPCMR), its correlation with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) and cardiovascular events.   Methods: We retrospectively included in the analysis all patients referred to our institution to undergo a SPCMR since January 2007 to April 2009. In all patients we performed a complete evaluation including anatomic, left ventricular function, adenosine stress perfusión and viability study. All the studies were performed in a 1.5 T scanner and 10 seconds breath-hold. Stress perfusión was performed alter iv adenosine bolus (140 ug/Kg/min). Eight minutes after the stress, the rest phase was performed. Viability analysis was done after the iv injection of gadolinium based contrast (0.15 mMol/ kg). A positive SPCMR was considered in those with mismatch areas between stress and rest phases. In those patients who underwent a CCA, we correlated the SP-CMR findings with the presence and location of stenoses equal or greater than 70% as significant.   Results: We included 71 patients during the mentioned period. Indication for SPCMR were heart failure and viability study (64%); coronary ischemia (36%). Main baseline characteristics were: Male 7%; age 9 ±7 years; diabetes 17%; hypertension 13%; previous family history for CAD 15%; and tobacco 20%. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 53±7 %. Mean time to complete the exam was 50±5 minutes. There were not adverse reactions to contrast or adenosine. Thirty one patients (42%) underwent CCA. All patients with stenoses greater than 70% had a positive SPCMR. Agreement between CCA and SPCMR for ischemia location was 90%.   Conclusion: SPCMR is feasible, safe and reliable in patients with suspected ischemia. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values make this non invasive technique a very appealing tool in clinical practice.

Palabras clave : Cardiac Magnetic Resonance; coronary angiography.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons