SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número2Pacientes policonsultantes: ¿un síntoma del sistema de salud en Chile?La posthumanidad como un bien objetivo: los peligros del futurismo en el debate sobre la optimización genética humana índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Acta bioethica

versión On-line ISSN 1726-569X

Resumen

TABOADA R., Paulina. Palliative Sedation (Part II): Ethical questions and moral principles. Acta bioeth. [online]. 2014, vol.20, n.2, pp.225-235. ISSN 1726-569X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2014000200010.

This article analyzes some of the most controversial ethical questions related to the use of sedation at the end-of-life. Among these questions are: 1. Whether there is an ethically relevant difference between Palliative Sedation (PS) and euthanasia and physician-assisted-suicide; 2. Whether the principle of double effect can be appropriately applied to justify the use of sedation at the end-of-life; 3. Whether PS might be ethically acceptable in the case of patients that are not imminently dying (agony); 4. Whether decisions to limit care and to withdraw medically assisted nutrition and hydration are a necessary condition for PS; 5. Whether sedation is an adequate response to psycho-spiritual symptoms, including ‘existential suffering’; 6. Whether sedation could be used in patients who are not able to give their informed consent (e.g. patients with cognitive impairment of diverse origins, etc.). Ethical- and anthropological reflections are proposed for each of these questions. Reference to some general ethical principles is made, such us: the inviolability of human life; respect for the dignity of the dying; the therapeutic principle and proportionality in medical care; the principle of double effect; respect for a responsible exercise of freedom (autonomy); justice and solidarity.

Palabras clave : palliative care; deep sedation; terminal care; hospice care; euthanasia.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons