SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.82 número3Direcciones futuras de la ecotoxicología en Chile: implicancias para la evaluación de riesgo ambiental de productos veterinarios utilizados en acuiculturaEcología de comunidades (2007) índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados




Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google


Revista chilena de historia natural

versión impresa ISSN 0716-078X

Rev. chil. hist. nat. v.82 n.3 Santiago  2009 

Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 82:459-461,2009


Long-distance dispersal of a male puma (Puma concolor puma) in Patagonia

Dispersión de larga distancia de un puma (Puma concolor puma) macho en Patagonia




1 Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA

2 Conservación Patagónica, Patagonia Park, Cochrane, Chile

3 Instituto de Zoología, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile

* Corresponding author:

Pumas (Puma concolor Linnaeus, 1771) nave the largest geographic range of any terrestrial mammal in the Americas. Despite this large distribution, pumas are a species of conservation concern and believed in decline across much of their range (Caso et al. 2008). Research in North América suggests that dispersal is critical in maintaining connectivity of increasingly fragmented puma populations (Beier 1995, Sweanor et al. 2000, Stoner et al. 2006, Robinson et al. 2008). Puma dispersal maintains genetic diversity across the landscape and is essential in revitalizing small populations and recolonizing habitats in which local populations have become extinct (Le., source-sink dynamics) (Beier 1995, Stoner et al. 2006, Robinson et al. 2008, Stoner et al. 2008). Long distance dispersáis by pumas across large tracts of unsuitable habitat have been well recorded in North América (e.g., Logan & Sweanor 2001, Thompson & Jenks 2005, Stoner et al. 2008). Here we report on a long-distance dispersal event of a male Patagonian puma (Puma concolor puma) in South América as revealed by satellite and GPS téleme try.

Our ongoing study of pumas is located in the Aysen District, Chile. The study área covers approximately 120,000 ha and includes the Lago Cochrane National Reserve (6,925 ha), the private Estancia Valle Chacabuco (69,000 ha) and the southern portions of the Jeinimeni National Reserve (161,100 ha). The habitat is characteristic of rugged Patagonia mountains, and supports large numbers of native guanacos (Lama guanicoe Müller, 1776) and a small population of endangered huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus Molina, 1782). European hares (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) are abundant. Culpeo foxes (Lycalopex culpaeus Molina, 1782) and several scavenger birds, such as Andean cóndor (Vultur gryphus Linnaeus, 1758), caracara (Polyborus plancus Miller, 1777), and black-chested buzzard eagle (Geranoaetus melanoleucus Vieillot, 1819) are common. Extensive sheep farming is the most common land use in the áreas surrounding the reserve.

In spring 2008, we began a pilot study of pumas to test equipment and field logistics. We captured five pumas using hounds and fitted them with GPS collars (M. Elbroch, unpublished data). The first puma captured on the 12th of April was a subadult male of approximately 2.5 years (aged using tooth condition; Heffelfinger 1997). The puma was fitted with a SirTrack ARGOS GPS collar, programmed to acquire fixes three times per day. From the location data, we estimated dispersal distance using three different methods. First, we calculated the straight-line distance between the capture point and the last location we recorded (Thompson & Jenks 2005). Second, we calculated the dispersal distance as a) the sum of straight-line vectors overlaid on travel routes (Le., excluding side excursions and back tracking) and b) the cumulative distance calculated by summing all distances between each successful fix (Stoner et al. 2008).

We gathered data on Puma 1 for 112 days, before his collar stopped sending data. For 48 days, Puma 1 remained in our study área and utilized an área 199 km2 in size (Minimum Convex Polygon, ArcGIS 9.1). Average daily movements ± SD during this period were 6.3 ± 6.58 km day1; range 0.36-23.61). On May 5th, the puma permanently departed the study área and moved east into Argentina and then south paralleling the border between Chile and Argentina. Average daily movements ± SD during his dispersal period were 11.7 ±7.45 km day1 (range 0.83-33.98). The total recorded dispersal distances were 167 km (straight-line), 363 km (sum of straight-line vectors) and 757.4 km (cumulative distance between each successful fix) (Fig. 1). We underwent a site investigation at the last recorded position, and confirmed that the puma had been killed on a sheep farm near Tuco Tuco, Argentina.

The long observed dispersal distance suggests the potential for metapopulation dynamics (Beier 1995, Sweanor et al. 2000. Stoner et al. 2006, Robinson et al. 2008) in southern South América, even in áreas where pumas continué to be heavily persecuted (Franklin et al. 1999). In southern South América the clear boundaries between more rugged, protected áreas with higher densities of wild prey, and more accessible áreas with active sheep ranching suggest the potential for source-sink dynamics. Observed movements and mortality of this collared individual highlight the need for large-scale puma studies in South América. In addition, more information is required to better understand the extent to which inhospitable matrix are a barrier to puma movements and the long term persistence of pumas in protected áreas. We suggest that large scale studies in southern South América include both genetic tools to assess gene flow, and telemetry to better understand the influence of matrix habitat between protected áreas on the viability of increasingly fragmented puma populations.

Initial funding for this work was generously provided by the National Geographic Society, Conservación Patagónica, Felidae Conservation Fund, Pacific Rim Research Program, and the Hemispheric Institute on the Americas. We are thankful to all people who helped in the capturing of pumas, particularly SAG (Chile Agricultural and Cattle Service), Arcilio Sepúlveda and Boone Smith.


BEIER P (1995) Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 228-237.        [ Links ]

CASO A, C LÓPEZ-GONZÁLEZ, E PAYAN, E EIZIRIK, T DE OLIVEIRA, R LEITE-PITMAN, M KELLY, C VALDERRAMA & M LUCHERINI (2008) Puma concolor. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. URL: (accessed on 30 January 2009).        [ Links ]

FRANKLIN WL, WE JOHNSON, RJ SARNO, & JA IRIARTE (1999) Ecology of the Patagonia puma in southern Chile. Biological Conservation 90: 33-40.        [ Links ]

HEFFELFINGER J (1997) Age criteria for Arizona game species. Special Report #19, Arizona Game and Fish Department: 25-26.        [ Links ]

LOGAN KA & LL SWEANOR (2001) Desert puma: Evolutionary ecology and conservation of an enduring carnivore. Island Press, Washington. 463 pp.        [ Links ]

ROBINSON HS, RB WIELGUS, HS COOLEY & SW COOLEY (2008) Sink populations in carnivore management: Cougar demography and immigration in a hunted population. Ecological Applications 18: 1028-1037.        [ Links ]

STONER DC, ML WOLFE & DM CHOATE (2006) Cougar exploitation levéis in Utah: implications for demographic structure, population recovery, and metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 1588-1600.        [ Links ]

STONER DC, WR RIETH, ML WOLFE, MB MECHAM & A NEVILLE (2008) Long-distance dispersal of a female cougar in a basin and range landscape. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 933-939.        [ Links ]

SWEANOR LL, KA LOGAN & MG HORNOCKER (2000) Cougar dispersal patterns, metapopulation dynamics, and conservation. Conservation Biology 14: 798-808.        [ Links ]

THOMPSON DJ, & JA JENKS (2005) Long-distance dispersal by a subadult male cougar from the Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management 69: 818-820.        [ Links ]

Received May 7, 2009; accepted June 1, 2009

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons