SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Efecto Cicatrizante de la Miel de Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia) Suplementada con Ácido Ascórbico como Tratamiento en QuemadurasForamen Mental I: Estudio Radiográfico de su Posición Antero-posterior y Forma en Población Iraquí índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


International Journal of Morphology

versão On-line ISSN 0717-9502

Int. J. Morphol. vol.33 no.1 Temuco mar. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000100023 

Int. J. Morphol., 33(1):144-148, 2015.

 

Maxillary Sinus Septa Prevalence and Morphology-Computed Tomography Based Analysis

 

Prevalencia y Morfología del Septo del Seno Maxilar. Análisis Basado en Estudios de Tomografía Computadorizada

 

Magdalena Malec*; Tomasz Smektala*,**; Marcin Tutak**; Grzegorz Trybek* & Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak*,**

* The Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstanców Wielkopolskich, Poland.

** "Aesthetic Dent" Private Dental Practice, Niedzialkowskiego, Poland.

Correspondence to:


SUMMARY: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa, and in particular sagittally orientated forms, which cannot be visualized by classic 2D x-rays. Thereby authors would like to provide information about the potential patient group, to be referred for the computed tomography scan before sinus lift procedure. The analysis was based on 216 computed tomography archival images. The exclusion criterion was occurrence of any suspected pathology in the maxillary region. The septa prevalence that was investigated in computed tomography was high (49%) with the mean height of 5.44 mm. The incidence of sagittally orientated septa as a challenge in 2D x-rays was 10%, with the second molar region as the most frequent location. Based on the obtained results and radiation safety principles, the authors suggest that orthopantomogram x-ray may be a sufficient ancillary radiological examination before beginning preimplant surgical procedure in the area of the maxillary sinus.

KEY WORDS: Dental Implants; Sinus Floor Augmentation; Maxillary Sinus.


RESUMEN: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia, ubicación y morfología del septo del seno maxilar, y en particular de las formas orientadas sagitalmente, que no pueden ser visualizadas con el uso de equipos convencionales de Rayos X en dos dimensiones. De esta manera, se busca ofrecer información sobre el grupo potencial de pacientes, que serán sometidos a estudios de tomografía computarizada antes de la elevación del seno maxilar. El análisis se basó en 216 imágenes de archivo de tomografía computarizada. El criterio de exclusión fue la presencia de cualquier sospecha de patología en la región maxilar. La prevalencia de septos hallados en tomografía computarizada fue alta (49%) con una altura media de 5,44 mm. La incidencia de septos orientados sagitalmente, encontrados en estudios de Rayos X 2D fue del 10%, siendo la localización más frecuente la región del segundo molar. De acuerdo a los resultados obtenidos y respetando los principios de seguridad radiológica, los autores sugieren que la ortopantomografía de rayos X puede ser un examen radiológico suficiente antes de comenzar el procedimiento quirúrgico de implante en el área del seno maxilar.

PALABRAS CLAVE: Implantes dentales; Elevación del piso del seno maxilar; Seno maxilar.


 

INTRODUCTION

Since the maxillary sinus lift procedure has become routine in oral rehabilitation, detailed knowledge related to maxillary sinus anatomy and its variations is indispensable. One of the most common morphological variations was described by Underwood as sinus septa (Underwood, 1909). Septa prevalence should be considered on each occasion prior to sinus lift surgery, as its presence may lead to perforation or tearing of the Schneiderian membrane or a reduction in the capability of augmentation steps and may force the surgeon to enlarge the operation to an extent that it may result in a decrease in treatment success rate (Underwood, 1909; van den Bergh et al., 2000; Chanavaz, 1990; ten Bruggenkate et al., 1998; Ulm et al., 1995; Ella et al., 2008).

Standard diagnostic technique in oral implantology is an orthopantomogram (OPG). However in OPG, the septa cannot be decisively excluded or detected due to the difficulty in clearly differentiating it from other anatomic structures, perhaps resulting in a false diagnosis in 11.8­52.68% compared to computed tomography (CT) (Ulm et al.; Ella et al.). This makes the computed tomography scan obligatory before sinus floor elevation (Kasabah et al., 2002; Koymen et al., 2009; Krennmair et al., 1997; Pommer et al., 2012). Nevertheless, the radiation dose means that there has to be a policy regarding the careful use of this method.

Consequently, the aim of this study was to examine the prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa, especially those sagittally orientated which cannot be visualized in OPG. A correlation between the anatomic variation and age, sex or side of localization was also investigated. The authors would also like to provide information about the potential number of septa that cannot by diagnosed in OPG (the standard method), leading to examples of diagnostic mistakes and failure during later surgical procedures. This data is aimed to assist in the establishment of clear guideline for CT scan patient screening prior to sinus lift procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This retrospective study was based on an analysis of 216 computed tomography archival images obtained from the Private Unit of Maxillofacial Radiology. The selection criteria was that only scans performed for reasons other than the visualization of suspected pathology in maxillary region could be included in the analysis. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained from an I-CAT device (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, UK). Images were recorded at 120 kVP and 3­5 mA using a 160 mm field of view, an axial slice thickness of 0.2 mm with isotropic voxels. Image analysis was performed via RadiAnt software, v1.8 (Medixant, Poznan´, Poland).

Each patient signed consent forms prepared in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration, including all amendments and revisions.

All examinations and measurements were carried out by a PhD fellow in oral surgery with at least 3 years experience (M.M.). The septa were diagnosed and measured in three orthogonal slice views: transverse, coronal and sagittal. All measurements were taken twice by the same observer at an interval of 2 weeks (M.M.).

Patients were divided into groups depending on age and sex. The septa were divided according to location, orientation and type (partial, complete). The mean height of the septa was measured. In order to classify septa location, the antral cavity was divided into three regions: anterior (above the premolars), middle (from the first molar to the second) and posterior: (mesial to the distal aspect of the third molar). The Pearson X2 test was performed for statistical analysis with regard to sex, age and localization (p<0.05). The prevalence of exostoses was also checked. All records were made in Microsoft Excel 2003 (Microsoft Office, Redmond, WA, United States). If the vertical dimension of the septa was over 2.5 mm it was included in the study, otherwise it was classified as exostosis (Ulm et al.). Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 12.0.1 software program (SPSS, Chicago, Ill., USA).

RESULTS

The analysis of the CBCT scans revealed that septa occurred in 106 of 216 patients (49%). One hundred and sixty three septa were present in 432 sinuses. Patient age ranged from 23 to 92. The average number of septa was 1.52±0.7; in most cases one septa occurred (60%) with an average height of 5.44 mm. The location of the septa was, in most cases, the middle region: 90 septa (66%) were above the roots of the second molar (Table I). Next in order of prevalence was the anterior region where were 30 septa (18%) were noted. In the posterior region 21 septa (13%) were found. The most frequent orientation was the coronal plane (59%). Data in regard to sex are listed in Table II and III.

In this study the prevalence of exostoses was also performed and reached 16%, with a higher prevalence on the left side. No statistically significant differences were observed with regard to sex or localization. The only significant relationship was septa occurrence in the 50-59 age group (p>0.05) (Table IV).

Table I. Brief characteristics of the study group
and the main results of the analysis.

Table II. Septa orientation and location in females.
Women (56- number of patients where septa occurred).

Table III. Septa orientation and location in males.
Men (50- number of patients where septa occurred).

Table IV. Septa number and occurrence according to age group.

DISCUSSION

The presented study revealed that the prevalence of sinus septa is 49%, relatively high in regard to other reports which were in the range of 25­35.5% (Ulm et al.; Kasabah et al.; Gonzáles-Santana et al., 1997; Kim et al., 2006; Underwood, 1910). Nonetheless it should be reiterated that the most reliable method of measurement is only obtained through the use of CT scans.

The average septal height was found to be 5.5 mm, a similar figure reported by other researchers who reported mean heights of 5.9±3 mm, 5.4 mm and 4.9 mm, respectively (Velásquez-Plata et al., 2002; Gosau et al., 2009; Maestre-Ferrin et al., 2011). The height of the septa may have an influence on sinus lift procedures used in maxillary bone compromised patients before dental implant treatment (Neugebauer et al., 2010). The septa can limit the view of the sinus floor or placement of grafts, and therefore the proper filling of the sinus floor (Ulm et al., 1995). A modification of conventional surgical procedure might be required where a complete septa at the frontal plane occurred, in this case a double window technique would be necessary (van den Bergh et al.; Betts & Miloro, 1994). Another interesting alternative is the possibility of using the septa as an implant field to avoid a sinus lift procedure completely (Fortin et al., 2013). If the septa (exostosis) is lower than 2.5 mm or situated in a position which would not disturb any procedures, other treatments are not required. However a medium sized, sagittal or horizontal septa can limit access to the maxillary sinus and required more advanced procedures through a modification of the opening window shape (van den Bergh et al.; Fortin et al.).

Regarding location, our study presented a greater incidence in the middle region (66%) as the majority of other authors (Koymen et al.; Kim et al.; Velásquez-Plata et al.), 64%, 41.1%, 51%, although two observers did found more in the anterior region (Ulm et al.; Krennmair et al.).

Panoramic radiograph are the most commonly used diagnostic methods for planning dental implant treatment, but two-dimensional imaging may provide 11.8­52.68% of false-negative results (Kasabah et al.; Koymen et al.; Krennmair et al.; Pommer et al.). This may occur in situations especially if the septa is sagittally orientated. Our research revealed that summary sagittally orientated septa prevalence was 10%, especially above the area of the second molar. In recent years the CBCT technique has become more popular for maxillocraniofacial imaging (Mozzo et al., 1998). It has the advantage that CT imaging and dose absorbtion is similar to dental panoramic radiology (Ludlow et al., 2006). It is also important to note that beam-hardening artefacts, due to metallic materials, are weaker at CBCT than at multi slice CT (Carrafiello et al., 2010). From a radiation point of view, CBCT examinations can be used in the place of CT in order to evaluate anatomical structures such as the maxillary sinus. However our study has shown a low incidence of potentially problematically orientated Septa - 10%. Its most frequent localization, above the area of the second molar, was also clinically negligible following guidelines for the amount of limited dental implants for fixed dental arch reconstruction (Heydecke et al., 2012). This result may suggest that OPG will be sufficient in most cases. The greater availability of panthomogram in dental practices also is beneficial regarding their use, in contrast to CT or CBCT.

Septa incidence in relation to age, shows that the highest rate was found in age group from 50-59, which was also the most numerous, with the lowest number of septa being seen in the 10-19 and 80-89 age groups. Patients who make up the 50­59 age group are the most frequently referred for implantation procedures and as a result these are the individuals who should be most accurately diagnosed (Lee et al., 2013; Di et al., 2013).

CONCLUSION

Septa prevalence investigated in CBCT is high (49%) especially in the area above the second molar and frontal orientation. The mean height of septa is 5.44 mm. The only significant correlation of septa was noted between the incidence in the 50­59 age groups. The incidence of septa that could be problematic in OPG (sagittally orientated) was 10% with the second molar region as the most frequent localization. This result, together with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) radiation safety principles, have led the authors to suggest that OPG may be a sufficient ancillary diagnostic tool and test before any sinus lift procedures take place.

REFERENCES

Betts, N. J. & Miloro, M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 52(3):332-3, 1994.         [ Links ]

Carrafiello, G.; Dizonno, M.; Colli, V.; Strocchi, S.; Pozzi-Taubert, S.; Leonardi, A.; Giorgianni, A.; Barresi, M.; Macchi, A.; Bracchi, E.; Conte, L. & Fugazzola, C. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol. Med., 115(4):600-11, 2010.         [ Links ]

Chanavaz, M. Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology--eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J. Oral. Implantol., 16(3):199-209, 1990.         [ Links ]

Di, P.; Lin, Y.; Li, J. H.; Luo, J.; Qiu, L. X.; Chen, B. & Cui, H. Y. The All-on-Four implant therapy protocol in the management of edentulous Chinese patients. Int. J. Prosthodont., 26(6):509-16, 2013.         [ Links ]

Ella, B.; Noble, Rda. R.; Lauverjat, Y.; Séderat, C.; Zwetyenga, N.; Siberchicot, F. & Caix, P. Septa within the sinus: effect on elevation of the sinus floor. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 46(6):464-7, 2008.         [ Links ]

Fortin, T.; Camby, E.; Alik, M.; Isidori, M. & Bouchet, H. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 15(2):198-204, 2013.         [ Links ]

Gonzáles-Santana, H.; Peñarrocha-Diago, M.; Guarinos-Carbó, J. & Sorní-Bröker, M. A study of the septa in the maxillary sinuses and the subantral alveolar processes in 30 patients. J. Oral. Implantol., 33(6):340-3, 2007.         [ Links ]

Gosau, M.; Rink, D.; Driemel, O. & Draenert, F. G. Maxillary sinus anatomy: a cadaveric study with clinical implications. Anat. Rec., 292(3):352-5, 2009.         [ Links ]

Heydecke, G.; Zwahlen, M.; Nicol, A.; Nisand, D.; Payer, M.; Renouard, F.; Grohmann, P.; Mühlemann, S. & Joda, T. What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 23(Suppl. 6):217-28, 2012.         [ Links ]

Kasabah, S.; Slezák, R.; Simúnek, A.; Krug, J. & Lecaro, M. C. Evaluation of the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in the definition of maxillary sinus septa. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove), 45(4):173-5, 2002.         [ Links ]

Kim, M. J.; Jung, U. W.; Kim, C. S.; Kim, K. D.; Choi, S. H.; Kim, C. K. & Cho, K. S. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J. Periodontol., 77(5):903-8, 2006.         [ Links ]

Koymen, R.; Gocmen-Mas, N.; Karacayli, U.; Ortakoglu, K.; Ozen, T. & Yazici, A. C. Anatomic evaluation of maxillary sinus septa: surgery and radiology. Clin. Anat., 22(5):563-70, 2009.         [ Links ]

Krennmair, G.; Ulm, C. & Lugmayr, H. Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 25(5):261-5, 1997.         [ Links ]

Lee, H. W.; Lin, W. S. & Morton, D. A retrospective study of complications associated with 100 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations via the lateral window approach. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 28(3):860-8, 2013.         [ Links ]

Ludlow, J. B.; Davies-Ludlow, L. E.; Brooks, S. L. & Howerton, W. B. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 35(4):219-26, 2006.         [ Links ]

Maestre-Ferrín, L.; Carrillo-García, C.; Galán-Gil, S.; Peñarrocha-Diago, M. & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. Prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa: panoramic radiograph versus computed tomography scan. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., 69(2):507-11, 2011.         [ Links ]

Mozzo, P.; Procacci, C.; Tacconi, A.; Martini, P. T. & Bergamo, I. A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol., 8(9):1558-64, 1998.         [ Links ]

Neugebauer, J.; Ritter, L.; Mischkowski, R. A.; Dreiseidler, T.; Scherer, P.; Ketterle, M.; Rothamel, D. & Zöller, J. E. Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone-beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 25(2):258-65, 2010.         [ Links ]

Pommer, B.; Ulm, C.; Lorenzoni, M.; Palmer, R.; Watzek, G. & Zechner, W. Prevalence, location and morphology of maxillary sinus septa: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Periodontol., 39(8):769-73, 2012.         [ Links ]

ten Bruggenkate, C. M. & van den Bergh, J. P. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: a valuable pre-prosthetic procedure. Periodontol. 2000, 17:176-82, 1998.         [ Links ]

Ulm, C. W.; Solar, P.; Krennmair, G.; Matejka, M. & Watzek, G. Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 10(4):462-5, 1995.         [ Links ]

Underwood, A. S. Surgical considerations connected with the anatomy of the maxillary sinus. Br. Med. J., 1(2524):1178, 1909.         [ Links ]

Underwood, A. S. An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J. Anat. Physiol., 44(Pt. 4):354-69, 1910.         [ Links ]

van den Bergh, J. P.; ten Bruggenkate, C. M.; Disch, F. J. & Tuinzing, D. B. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin. Oral. Implants Res., 11(3):256-65, 2000.         [ Links ]

Velásquez-Plata, D.; Hovey, L. R.; Peach, C. C. & Alder, M. E. Maxillary sinus septa: a 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants, 17(6):854-60, 2002.         [ Links ]


Correspondence to:

Tomasz Smektala

Department of Dental Surgery
Pomeranian Medical University
Powstan´ców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111
Szczecin
POLAND

Email: smektala.t@gmail.com

Received: 22-06-2014
Accepted: 24-10-2014

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons