SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.61 issue3SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF SACCHARINE, CAFFEINE, SALICYLIC ACID AND BENZOIC ACID IN DIFFERENT MATRIXES BY SALT AND AIR-ASSISTED HOMOGENEOUS LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHYDEVELOPMENT OF A KINETIC SPECTROPHOTOMETRY METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CICLOPIROX OLAMINE IN PHARMACEUTICAL SAMPLE author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society

On-line version ISSN 0717-9707

J. Chil. Chem. Soc. vol.61 no.3 Concepción Sept. 2016

http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072016000300018 

 

SYNTHESIS, ANTI-PHYTOPATHOGENIC AND DPPH RADICAL SCAVENGING ACTIVITIES OF C-PRENYLATED ACETOPHENONES AND BENZALDEHYDES

 

MAURICIO E. OSORIO1* KAROL A. QUIROZ1, MARCELA A. CARVAJAL2, ALEJANDRA P. VERGARA2, ELIZABETH Y. SÁNCHEZ2, CESAR E. GONZÁLEZ1 AND KAREN S. CATALÁN1

1 Laboratorio de Productos Naturales, Departamento de Química, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso 2390123, Chile.
2
Centro de Biotecnología CB-DAL, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso 2390136, Chile.
* e-mail: mauricio.osorio@usm.cl


ABSTRACT

The syntheses of six prenylated acetophenone and benzaldehyde derivatives and their anti-phytopathogenic and antioxidant activities are reported. These compounds were obtained by electrophilic aromatic substitution (SEAr) of the corresponding arenes and 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol using ZnCl2 as a Lewis acid catalyst in ethyl acetate. Reasonable to good yields were obtained based on unrecovered aromatic starting material (45-73%). All the synthesized compounds were evaluated against phytopathogenic gram-negative bacteria Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Pseudomonas syringae and Erwinia carotovora and plant fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Phytophthora cinnamomi and Gibberella fujikuroi. The antioxidant activity was evaluated using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity assay and expressed as half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values in μΜ concentrations. The antioxidant activity went from 27.20 μΜ to >100 μΜ. Compound 11 showed statistically significant inhibition of the growth of Botrytis cinerea, and compounds 13 and 15 showed statistically significant inhibition of the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi, with respect to negative control fungal growth. All six compounds showed bacteriostatic effects against gram-negative plant pathogenic bacteria with IC50 values between 250 and <3.9 μΜ.

Keywords: C-prenylation; prenylated acetophenone; prenylated benzaldehyde; electrophilic aromatic substitution; anti-phytopathogenic; DPPH radical scavenging activity.


 

1. INTRODUCTION

Acetophenones and benzaldehydes are versatile molecules and are widely used as precursors to other natural products such as flavonoids. Prenylated acetophenones have been found in diverse plant materials. Recent examples of prenylated acetophenones are 1, isolated from the root bark of Derris indica, a South Asian medicinal plant1, and the antinociceptive and gastroprotective 3,5-diprenyl-4-hydroxyacetophenone 2 from Ageratina pichinchensis2. The prenylated benzaldehyde montadial A 3 was isolated from the white rot fungus Bondarzewia montana that grows at the base of Abies and other conifers, and showed strong cytotoxic activity against L1210 (murine lymphocytic leukemia) as well as HL60 (promyelocytic human leukemia) tumor cells (Figure 1)3. Harronin I, a prenylated acetophenone, showed a MIC of 5 μg/mL against C. albicans, 6 μg/mL against B. cereus and more than 20 μg/mL against other tested microorganisms4.

 

Figure 1. Representative structures of natural prenylated acetophenones
(1, 2, Harronin I) and benzaldehyde (3).

 

Fungal plant pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea, Phytophthora cinnamomi and Gibberella fujikuroi attack a wide range of agriculturally and ornamentally important plants5 and significantly affect the economy of developing countries causing large economic losses in agriculture6.

Botrytis cinerea is a fungus that affects many species of plants causing necrotic injuries in different plant tissues7. Gibberella fujikuroi is a filamentous fungus that causes the disease called "bakanae" in rice and other grasses; it is characterized by excessive growth of the plant and a reduction in the size and quality of the fruit, caused by the excessive production of the plant growth hormone, Gibberellin GA38. Phytophthora cinnamomi is a phytopathogenic fungus that causes the disease "avocado root rot" and is the main phytosanitary problem of this fruit in Chile9. Excess moisture in the soil and root wounds create favorable conditions for this fungus10. Numerous treatments are used to control fungal phytopathogens, among others carboxin, captan, thiram, tebuconazole, metalaxyl, all of which pose a certain degree of danger. Further, in Chile, the highly toxic methyl bromide and other pesticides have been used to control B. cinerea in berries. Although pesticides are designed to control pests, they are also environmental poisons, affecting humans as the final consumers. A few years ago, Chile banned the use of methyl bromide under the Montreal Protocol11 and limited the use of pesticides based on recommendations from the Codex Alimentarius specifying the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for residues of pesticides or veterinary drugs in foods12.

Plant diseases caused by plant pathogenic bacteria are major problems for industrial agriculture in Chile because they affect plants of nutritional and commercial interest. Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Pseudomonas syringae and Erwinia carotovora are Gram-negative bacteria and are responsible for a number of economically important diseases in the Pacific Northwest and Southwest of the USA. These bacteria can infect a wide range of fruits, vegetables, and ornamental plants13-15. A variety of methods have been tested for the control of A. tumefaciens, P. syringae and E. carotovora in commercial plantings. However, the results of these control efforts have not always been successful. This gives rise to the need for new, less toxic products to replace the existing ones. Currently, the worldwide trend is to explore new alternatives to synthetic fungicides and bactericides in order to minimize the risks associated with the development of pathogen populations insensitive to these chemical compounds. At the moment, our research group investigates alternatives that are safer than the antiphytopathogens in current commercial use.

In general, terpenylphenols are isolated in very low yields from natural sources, and for that reason during the last few decades, considerable research effort has been focused on obtaining these compounds by synthesis. The most recurrent strategies used for synthesizing these compounds involve, as a first step, the separate preparation of the appropriate terpenyl fragments and the aromatic nucleus. The crucial step is the attachment of the aromatic synthon to the terpenyl skeleton16. There are many reports of different methods to accomplish these coupling reactions in the synthesis of prenylphenols, but most of them involve additional activation or protection procedures of precursors obtaining complex mixtures of O-prenyl, C-prenyl and di-C-prenyl phenols with low yields17. The electrophilic aromatic substitution (SEAr) reaction between a phenol and the desired prenol catalyzed by BF3OEt2 is a method of interest because of its simplicity and mild reaction conditions18,19. However, direct prenylation of phenols with electron withdrawing carbonyl groups is difficult because of the reduced activation of the aromatic ring for SEAr requiring long reaction times and toxic solvents20,21.

C-terpenyl acetophenones have been synthesized in modest yields using the terpenyl bromide and a strong alkaline medium as a catalyst in DMF at 80 °C 22. These conditions require very dry solvents, and the terpenyl bromide must be generated in a previous step. Also, C-prenylated acetophenones can be produced in two steps using the terpenyl bromide in an alkaline medium and heating at 220 °C to elicit a Claisen rearrangement that produces C-alkylation. In this reaction, the use of high temperatures, hazardous solvents and successive clean-up steps are required to obtain products in moderate yields23. C-Prenylated polyhydroxylated acetophenones and flavonoids have synthetized by prenylation of phenols with 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol in the presence of BF3.Et2O or ZnCl2 as Lewis acid catalysts in dioxane producing alkylated substances in middling yields24,25,26.

As natural and synthetic phenolic compounds often show good antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal activities27,28,29, in this manuscript we describe a simple and easily applicable synthesis of a series of prenylated acetophenone and benzaldehyde derivatives by a direct prenylation using prenol, ZnCl2 as the Lewis acid catalyst and ethyl acetate as the solvent under reflux conditions, as well as their anti-phytophatogenic and antioxidant (DPPH radical scavenging) activities.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

2.1 Synthesis

2.1.1. General Data

All purchased chemical reagents (Merck or Aldrich) were of the highest commercially available purity and were used without previous purification. Melting points (mp: °C) were measured on a Stuart-Scientific SMP3 melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded as a thin film (compound 13) or in KBr disks in a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer, and wavenumbers are reported in cm-1. Low resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific, Trace GC Ultra, ISQ mass spectrometer at 70 eV ionizing voltage and are given as m/z (% rel. int.). 1H-, 13C-(DEPT 135), 2D HSQC and 2D HMBC spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solutions and referenced to the residual solvent peaks at δ 7.26 ppm and δ 2.50 ppm for 1H and δ 77.0 ppm and δ 39.5 ppm for 13C, respectively, on a Bruker Avance 400 NMR spectrometer operating at 400.1 MHz for 1H and 100.6 MHz for 13C. Chemical shifts are reported as δ (ppm), and coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. Silica gel (Merck 200-400 mesh) was used for column chromatography and HF-254 silica gel plates for TLC. TLC spots were detected both under a UV lamp and by heating after drenching in 10% H2SO4 in H2O. Antioxidant effects were determined in a Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO 96-well plate photometer.

2.1.2. General Experimental Procedure

The appropriate acetophenone or benzaldehyde (1 mol equiv.) and anhydrous ZnCl2 (2 mol equiv.) were placed in a round-bottom flask and dissolved in ethyl acetate (100 mL). Under vigorous stirring, a solution of 3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol (10, 2 mol equiv.) in ethyl acetate (10 mL) was added dropwise during 1 h at 40 °C. The reaction mixture was then heated to reflux temperature while the stirring continued. After 2 - 4 h, a pH 1 aqueous HCl solution was added to the reaction mixture to decompose the Zn complex. Then, the organic layer was separated, and a new extraction with ethyl acetate was performed. The pooled organic solutions were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and filtered; the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The mixture was subjected to silica gel flash column chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexanes as the mobile phase) to yield the products.

2.1.3. Physical Data of Prenylated Acetophenones and Benzaldehydes

1-(2',4'-Dihydroxy-5'-(3"-methyl-2"-buten-l"-yl)phenyl)ethanone (1) was obtained from 1-(2',4'-dihydroxyphenyl)ethanone (4, 2.0 g, 13.1 mmol), prenol (10, 2.26 g, 26.2 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (3.57 g, 26.2 mmol), refluxing for 4 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate (70:30) to afford the title compound as a white solid (1.10 g, 38%); mp: 138-140 °C (lit.1 144°C); MS m/z: 220 (100%), 205 (59%), 177 (16%), 165 (99%), 149 (21%), 137 (12%), 69 (18%) (lit.1 Anal. Calcd. for C13H16O3: C, 70.89; H, 7.32. Found C, 70.76; H, 7.47; ESI-MS: m/z [M + H+] calcd for C13H16O3: 220.11; found: 221.24); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3282, 2967, 2912, 2849, 1638, 1618, 1509, 1420, 1378; 1H-NMR (CDCl3): 12.53 (s, 1H, ArC-2'-OH); 7.43 (s, 1H, ArH-6'); 6.36 (s, 1H, ArH-3'); 6.11 (s, 1H, ArC-4'-OH); 5.28 (m, 1H, C=CHCH2); 3.30 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, C=CHCH2); 2.55 (s, 3H, O=CCH3); 1.78 [s, 6H, CHC(CH3)2]; 13C-NMR (CDCl3): 17.9 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 25.8 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 26.2 (O=CCH3); 28.9 (C=CHCH2-); 103.7 (ArCH-3'); 114.0 (ArC-1'); 118.9 (ArC-5'); 121.4 (C=CHCH2); 132.2 (ArCH-6'); 135.3 (C=CHCH2); 161.6 (ArC-4'); 163.5 (ArC-2'); 202.7 (CH3C=O).

1-(2',6'-Dihydroxy-3'-(3"-methyl-2"-buten-1"-yl)phenyl)ethanone (11) was obtained from 1-(2',6'-dihydroxyphenyl)ethanone (5, 2.0 g, 13.1 mmol), prenol (10, 2.26 g, 26.2 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (3.57 g, 26.2 mmol), refluxing for 2 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate (80:20) to afford the title compound as a pale green solid (1.15 g, 40%); mp: 80-82 °C (lit.21 80-81°C); MS m/z: 220 (67%), 205 (23%), 187 (12%), 177 (15), 165 (100%), 149 (28%), 121 (12%), 91 (11%) (lit.21 EI-HRMS Calcd for C13H16O3 (M+) 220.1099, Found 220.1102); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3346, 2964, 2925, 1597, 1569, 1421, 1374; 1H-NMR (CDCl3): 10.08 (s, 1H, ArC-6'-OH); 9.27 (s, 1H, ArC-2'-OH); 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, ArH-4'); 6.33 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz, ArH-5'); 5.28 (br. t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, C=CHCH2); 3.28 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, C=CHCH2); 2.73 (s, 3H, O=CCH3); 1.77 (s, 6H, CH=C(CH3)2]; 13C-NMR (CDCl3): 17.8 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 25.8 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 28.7 (C=CHCH2-); 33.6 (O=CCH3); 107.3 (ArCH-5'); 110.2 (ArC-1'); 119.3 (ArC-3'); 121.6 (C=CHCH2); 134.9 (C=CHCH2); 136.2 (ArCH-4'); 159.3 (ArC-2'); 159.7 (ArC-6'); 205.5 (CH3C=O).

1-(2',4',6'-Trihydroxy-3'-(3"-methyl-2"-buten-1"-yl)phenyl)ethanone (12) was obtained from 1-(2',4',6'-trihydroxyphenyl) ethanone (6, 2.0 g, 10.7 mmol), prenol (10, 1.84 g, 21.4 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (2.92 g, 21.4 mmol), refluxing for 4 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate (50:50) to afford the title compound as a pale yellow solid (1.13 g, 45%); mp: 174 °C (lit.32 173-174°C); MS m/z: 236 (68%), 193 (33%), 181 (100%), 165 (47%) (lit.32 M.W. Found 238 Calcd. 236); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3420, 3333, 2973, 2922, 2864, 1635, 1599, 1560, 1450, 1434; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): 14.00 (s, 1H, ArC-2'-OH); 10.51 (s, 1H, ArC-4'-OH); 10.28 (s, 1H, ArC-6'-OH); 5.98 (s, 1H, ArH-5'); 5.09 (m, 1H, C=CHCH2); 3.05 (d, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz, C=CHCH2); 2.53 (s, 3H, O=CCH3); 1.66 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 1.58 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 13C-NMR (CDCl3): 17.6 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 20.9 (C=CHCH2-); 25.5 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 32.4 (O=CCH3); 94.0 (ArCH-5'); 103.8 (ArC-1'); 105.7 (ArC-3'); 123.3 (C=CHCH2); 129.5 (C=CHCH2); 160.2 (ArC-6'); 162.4 (ArC-4'); 163.2 (ArC-2'); 202.5 (CH3C=O).

1-(2'-Hydroxy-4',6'-dimethoxy-3'-(3"-methyl-2"-buten-1"-yl)phenyl) ethanone (13) was obtained from 1-(2'-hydroxy-4',6'-dimethoxyphenyl) ethanone (7, 1.0 g, 5.1 mmol), prenol (10, 0.88 g, 10.2 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (1.39 g, 10.2 mmol), refluxing for 4 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using using hexane-ethyl acetate (90:10) to afford the title compound as a pale yellowish oil (0.64 g, 48%); MS m/z: 264 (86%), 249 (100%), 233 (8%), 207 (14%), 181 (24%) 69 (8) (lit.33 Anal. Found: C, 68.58%; H, 7.85%; Calcd for C15H20O5: C, 68.18%; H, 7.57%); IR (Film, cm-1): 2966, 2936, 2856, 1698, 1619, 1589, 1580, 1443, 1406, 1363; 1H-NMR (CDCl3): 13.38 (s, 1H, ArC-2'-OH); 6.25 (s, 1H, ArH-5'); 5.13 (br. t, 1H, CCHCH2); 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3); 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH3); 3.25 (d, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz, C=CHCH2); 2.68 (s, 3H, O=CCH3); 1.76 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 1.68 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 13C-NMR (CDCl3): 17.8 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 22.4 (C=CHCH2-); 25.7 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 30.8 (O=CCH3); 55.8 (OCH3); 62.7 (OCH3); 96.0 (ArCH-5'); 109.0 (ArC-1'); 115.6 (ArC-3'); 123.0 (C=CHCH2); 131.5 (C=CHCH2); 161.6 (ArC-2'); 164.6 (ArC-4',6'); 203.3 (CH3C=O).

2,4-Dihydroxy-5-(3'-methyl-2'-buten-1'-yl)benzaldehyde (14) was obtained from 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (8, 2.0 g, 14.5 mmol), prenol (10, 2.50 g, 29.0 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (3.95 g, 29.0 mmol), refluxing for 2 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate (70:30) to afford the title compound. The solid was recrystallized from dichloromethane/hexane mixture to give a white solid (0.68 g, 23%); mp: 140-142 °C (lit.20 121-123°C, lit.49 140.5-141.0°C); MS m/z: 206 (81%), 191 (28%), 163 (40%), 151 (100%), 69 (21%) (lit.20 LC-EIMS: m/z: 205 [M-H]-); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3313, 3054, 2967, 2912, 2833, 1643, 1600, 1505, 1443, 1426; 1H-NMR (CDCl3): 11.26 (s, 1H, ArC-2-OH); 9.68 (s, 1H, CHO); 7.24 (s, 1H, ArH-6); 6.37 (s, 1H, ArH-3); 6.24 (s, 1H, ArC-4-OH); 5.29 (br. t, 1H, C=CHCH2); 3.31 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, C=CHCH2); 1.79 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 1.76 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 13C-NMR (CDCl3): 17.9 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 25.8 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 28.4 (C=CHCH2-); 103.3 (ArCH-3); 115.2 (ArC-1); 120.0 (ArC-5); 121.0 (C=CHCH2); 135.1 (ArCH-6); 135.7 (C=CHCH2); 162.4 (ArC-4); 162.8 (ArC-2); 194.5 (HC=O).

3,4-Dihydroxy-5-(3'-methyl-2'-buten-1'-yl)benzaldehyde (15) was obtained from 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (9, 2.0 g, 14.5 mmol), prenol (10, 2.50 g, 29.0 mmol), and anhydrous ZnCl2 (3.95 g, 29.0 mmol), refluxing for 2 h as described above. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography using hexane-ethyl acetate (60:40) to afford the title compound. The solid was recrystallized from dichloromethane/hexane mixture to give a white solid (0.60 g, 21%); mp: 145-147 °C (lit.34 72-73°C); MS m/z: 206 (97%), 151 (100%), 77 (11%) (lit.34 m/z: 206 [M+]); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3350, 2962, 2914, 2855, 1644, 1613, 1594, 1522, 1445; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6): 9.66 (s, 1H, CHO); 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 1.9 Hz, ArH-2,6); 5.27 (br. t, 1H, C=CHCH2); 3.34 (br. s, 2H, ArC-3,4-OH); 3.25 (d, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz, C=CHCH2); 1.68 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 1.66 (s, 3H, CHCCH3CH3); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6): 17.6 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 25.5 (CH3CH3C=CH2-); 27.8 (C=CHCH2-); 112.0 (ArCH-2); 122.1 (C=CHCH2); 124.2 (ArCH-6); 127.9 (ArC-1); 128.3 (ArC-5); 131.9 (C=CHCH2); 145.2 (ArC-3); 149.7 (ArC-4); 191.2 (HC=O).

2.2 Cytotoxicity Assays

2.2.1 In Vitro Antibacterial Activity Assays

Liquid-dilution methods were used to evaluate the effects of the compounds on the growth ofErwinia carotovora (NCPPB 312), Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain C58C1) and Pseudomonas syringae (NCPPB 281). Bacteria were grown in sterile tubes with 10 mL of Müller-Hinton (MH) medium and incubated at 27 °C for 12 h with shaking to produce an initial culture. The antimicrobial activity was evaluated by observing the growth response of both micro-organisms in samples with different concentrations of the compounds36-38. All assays were performed on sterile 96-well microplates with a final volume of200 μL containing Müller-Hinton broth (MH) inoculated with 1 μL aliquots of bacterial suspension (105-106 UFC/mL, initial culture) in the presence of different concentrations of test compounds (3.9, 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125 and 250 μΜ). MH was used as the negative control [C(-)], and MH with streptomycin39 was used as the positive control [C(+)]. The plates were incubated for 7 h at 27 °C. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 595 nm every hour with a microplate reader. All tests were performed in ten repetitions for each microorganism evaluated. Bacterial growth was shown as the arithmetic mean expressed in terms of the negative control (100% growth). The lowest concentration of the compound preventing the appearance of turbidity was considered to be the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC).

The first experiment (first kinetic assay) in which the compound was exposed to the bacterial cultures in MH was carried out over a period of 6 hours. Subsequently, to determine the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), a second experiment (second kinetic assay) was conducted; this experiment involved taking inoculum from the first kinetic assay and adding it to MH in a new 96-well microplate, which was then cultured for 7 hours. The aim of this second culture (second kinetic assay) was to observe and quantify the ability of bacterial cultures to recover from the cytotoxic effect caused by the compounds, which is evidenced by the presence or absence of bacterial growth. This second experiment allows a more accurate conclusion to be reached: if the bacterial culture's growth declines with respect to the culture of the first kinetic assay, then it is related to a bactericidal property. If, on the other hand, the growth continues in line with that of the culture of first kinetic assay, then it is related to a bacteriostatic property.

2.2.2 In Vitro Fungicidal Activity Assays

A virulent isolate of Botrytis cinerea obtained from naturally infected grape berries40 was prepared and maintained by plating it on potato dextrose agar at 5 °C. Phytophthora cinnamomi was kindly provided by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA, La Platina, Santiago, Chile). The fungus Gibberella fujikuroi was kindly provided by Dr. B. Fraga, Natural Products and Agrobiology Institute, CSIC, Canary Islands, Spain. The agar dilution technique was used to evaluate the effect of the prenylated compounds on the growth of P. cinnamomi41,42, G. fujikuroi43 and B. cinerea44,45. Fungicidal activity assays of these compounds were performed in microcultures by growing the fungi in sterile Petri dishes (35 mm) at a final volume of 2 mL medium containing different compound concentrations. Clarified V8 (Campbell Soup) medium containing metalaxyl46 for P. cinnamomi or PDA medium for B. cinerea and G. fujikuroi with captan47,48 was used as the positive control [C(+)], and without fungicide as the negative control [C(-)]). The medium in each slot was then inoculated with a small block (4 mm) of clarified V8 or PDA medium containing fungal hyphae excised from the edge of an actively growing culture. The fungal growth was monitored at different times (24-72 hours). To determine the growth of mycelium in the agar plate, the surface of the mycelium was measured using Sigma Scan Pro 5 software. The final results are expressed as percent growth inhibition, calculated according to the control without fungicide. Each treatment was independently performed in triplicate.

2.2.3 Statistics

A one-way ANOVA was performed to identify significant differences among the treatment and control groups. Tukey's honest significant difference test was applied to compare the means of every treatment against the control and simultaneously establish their significance (P < 0.05). All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± S.D.).

2.3 General Procedure to Determine Antioxidant Activity (DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity)

The radical scavenging activity of the prenylated compounds and starting materials towards the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical was measured as described35, with modifications to adapt the screen to 96-well plates. Stock solutions of each compound were prepared in methanol at a 1 mM concentration (10 mL). Dilutions (1-200 μM) were prepared from the stock solutions. Methanol (90 μL), each dilution (150 μL), and DPPH (60 μL, Sigma-Aldrich) in methanol (0.5 mM), resulting in a final concentration of 0.1 mM DPPH, were added in a 96-well plate. Methanol was used as the blank sample. The mixtures were left for 30 min at room temperature, and the absorbances were then measured at 517 nm. Trolox was used as the standard antioxidant. The radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows: % Inhibition = [(blank absorbance - sample absorbance) / blank absorbance] × 100. The mean of three IC50 (concentration causing 50% inhibition) values for each compound was determined graphically.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of prenylated phenols was carried out in one step via the SEAr mechanism as shown in Scheme 1. The reaction of different acetophenones (4, 5, 6 and 7) and benzaldehydes (8, 9) with prenol in the presence of ZnCl2 in ethyl acetate produced prenylated acetophenones 1, 11-13 and prenylated benzaldehydes 14-15 in moderate yields (38-480% and 21-23 %, respectively), leaving abundant unreacted aromatic starting material. Yields improved significantly by considering only reacted starting material (e.g. compound 1 from 38% up to 73%; compound 11 from 40% up to 55%; compound 12 from 45% up to 63%; compound 13 from 48% up to 60%; compound 14 from 23% up to 50%; compound 15 from 21% up to 45%).

 

Scheme 1. One-step synthesis of prenylated polyhydroxylated acetophenones and benzaldehydes.
Conditions and reagents: (a): ZnCl2/ AcOEt, 40 °C, reflux, 2-4 h — 1, 11-15.

 

It is possible that polyalkylations occurred in very small yields as byproducts in these reactions. Despite the fact that the TLC plates displayed multiple spots, the monoalkylated product and starting material are the main components of these reaction mixtures. The ZnCl2 must be dry because moisture negatively affects the quality of the catalyst and the reaction yield. Poor to reasonable yields of prenylation were obtained under the reaction conditions used (in the presence of air) giving several non-isolated compounds. Reflux conditions forced us to conduct the reactions in a non-inert atmosphere. This could lead to complex reaction mixtures due to oxidations and other side reactions. Benzaldehyde 9 and its prenylated derivative 15 have two ortho-OH groups bound to the benzene moiety; this catechol function might lead to oxidative processes under these reaction conditions. The yields were markedly improved when calculated only from reacted acetophenone and benzaldehyde because abundant aromatic starting material was recovered from all the reactions after column chromatography. Longer reaction times led to complex mixtures and losses of the main product in all cases. Side reactions led to lower allylation yields. Elimination reaction mechanisms can also occur in the allylic carbocation under these reaction conditions. Vanillin and compounds with only one free hydroxyl group did not react under these conditions because the molecules are probably not sufficiently activated due the presence of the electron-withdrawing carbonyl group. Additional hydroxyl groups on the ring structure of these compounds enhance the reactivity and favor electrophilic attack.

We believe that the regioselectivity achieved with this methodology is of particular intrerest; it arises during the key step of Zn(II) complexation to both the phenol and allylic alcohol substrates. After coordination, the allylic residue is located adjacent to the phenol function. Thereupon, the active ortho carbon of the phenol ring is joined to the allylic carbocation intermediate of the prenol. A similar alkylation mechanism was proposed for the C-acylation of phenol and naphtol derivatives catalyzed by ZnCl2 supported on Al2O3 as a catalyst under solvent-free and microwave conditions [30,31]. Also, the allylation position was primarily in the less sterically hindered position in all the isolated products.

The structure of 1 was mainly established by NMR, where aromatic ring proton signals at dH = 7.45 (s, 1H) and δH = 6.35 (s, 1H) were observed as two singlets for H-6 and H-3, confirming the aromatic mono-substitution position. Also, the doublet at δH = 3.30 ppm assigned to the methylene group bound to aromatic ring carbon C-5 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, C=CHCH2) confirmed the occurrence of C-alkylation but not O-alkylation. On the other hand, the point of coupling between the prenyl fragment and the aromatic ring of compound 11 was confirmed by the presence of the signal at 3.28 ppm (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H) assigned to the CH2-1'' hydrogens, which was correlated (by 2D HSQC) with the carbon atom at δ 28.7 ppm (CH2-1") and corroborated by the 2D HMBC 3 J heteronuclear correlations between CH2-1'' and the carbon signals at δ 136.2 (ArCH-4'), 159.3 (ArC-2') ppm and 2 J heteronuclear correlations with δ 121.6 (CH-2'') ppm (Figure S7). Similarly, we could determine the structure of all the synthesized compounds and confirm prenylation ortho with respect to the same hydroxyl group. All these compounds were previously known, and their experimental data (NMR, GC-MS, IR, m.p.) were obtained to confirm their structures and compared with data from the literature for 11, 1121, 1232, 1333, 1420 and 1534.

3.2. Anti-Phytopathogenic Activity

The inhibitory effect was evaluated as the percentage of growth inhibition, calculated using the area of mycelial growth of each fungus in the presence and absence of prenylated compounds. The means of three independent assays are summarized in Table 1. For comparison, the values of the percentage of growth inhibition obtained with the commercial antifungals captan and metalaxyl, widely used to control the growth of B. cinerea and P. cinnamomi, are included.

 

Table 1. Inhibition of mycelial growth (%) of plant pathogenic fungi in the presence of
prenylated compounds.

Prenylated compounds were added to the incubation media from a stock solution using
ethanol/water (1%) as the solvent. The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth is based
on mycelium area measurements after 72 h of incubation. Each point represents the mean
of at least three independent experiments. *C+ refers to the positive control (a captan at
100 μΜ and b metalaxyl at 75 μΜ) and C— refers to the negative control and corresponds
to stock solution with solvent (1% aqueous ethanol).

 

The prenylated compounds showed statistically significant growth inhibition of Gibberella fujikuroi with high percentages of inhibition 72 h post inoculation at 250, 500 and 1000 μΜ with respect to fungal growth (negative control).

The results with P. cinnamomi showed that at the lowest concentration (250 μΜ) none of the compounds were able to inhibit growth of this fungus (with the exception of 15, causing 100% inhibition at all concentrations), but compounds 12 and 13 inhibited the growth of P. cinnamomi to a greater extent than that of G. fujikuroi, at 500 and 1000 μΜ (concentration-dependent effect). Compound 15 proved to be selective for P. cinnamomi and G. fujikuroi at lower concentrations (250 and 500 μΜ).

Table 1 shows that B. cinerea was the most resistant to the treatment with the prenylated compounds.

Compound 12 stands out among the compounds tested because it exhibits a high capacity to inhibit the growth of the three fungi, in high percentages, even exceeding 80% in some cases. Conversely, compound 11 shows the lowest antifungal activity of those recorded for the acetophenone group; however, 11 showed statistically significant inhibition activity though only towards G. fujikuroi.

The results of the antibacterial activity assays showed that all the prenylated compounds were able to inhibit in vitro growth of the three strains of bacteria tested (Table 2). Remarkably, most of the compounds significantly inhibited the growth of all three bacterial species in high percentages. Compound 11 showed lower but not negligible inhibition values. This was corroborated by calculating the IC50 values for each compound according to the bacteria tested (Table 3). Statistical analysis revealed that the inhibition values obtained are significant (P <0.05) compared to the negative control.

 

Table 2. Percentage of inhibition of bacterial growth in the presence of prenylated
compounds.

Prenylated compounds were added to the incubation media from a stock solution using
ethanol/water (1%) as the solvent. The percentage of inhibition of bacterial growth is
based on optical density (OD595nm) measurements after 7 h of incubation. Each point
represents the mean of at least four independent experiments. C+ (data not shown)
refers to the positive control (streptomycin, 5 μΜ) which showed 100% inhibition in all
cases; and C— refers to the negative control and corresponds to stock solution with
solvent (1% aqueous ethanol) (100% bacterial growth, data not shown).

 

Table 3. IC50 values of prenylated compounds against
phytopathogenic bacteria.

Antibacterial activities are shown as IC50 values in μΜ
concentrations ± SD. IC50 values were calculated from
the first kinetic assay. Positive control corresponds to
streptomycin (5 μΜ).

 

The IC50 values indicate that the bacteria tested have different levels of sensitivity to the compounds tested. The most sensitive bacterial species was P. syringae, and the most resistant one was A. tumefaciens. This behavior informs us not only about the origin of each strain and its possible domestication in the laboratory, but also about different mechanisms of action of each compound on the pathogen tested, considering that the three bacteria tested have a similar membrane organization (Gram-negative).

After the first kinetic assay, the bactericidal capacity of each of the compounds was evaluated in a second growth kinetic assay using an inoculum from the first kinetics plate. This new culture was incubated for 7 hours, and the absorbance was measured. As a result, it was noted that the bacterial culture was able to recover its growth rate (with respect to the culture without the compound) to an extent between 50 to 85%. This means that the antibacterial effect observed with some compounds corresponds to a bacteriostatic effect at the concentrations tested, or it can be assumed that the MBC value for all compounds is greater than 250 μM (the highest concentration tested in the assay).

Compounds 11, 13 and 15 showed outstanding selectivity against P. syringae and to a lesser extent E. carotovora.

3.3. DPPH radical scavenging activity

The results obtained from the antioxidant activity assays are shown in Table 4. All the compounds were compared with trolox. Compound 9 was the only active precursor. The prenylated benzaldehyde 15 has an antioxidant activity close to the IC50 value of trolox. The prenylated acetophenone 12 is half as potent as trolox and 15. The presence of a carbonyl group attached to the benzene ring resulted in a decrease of the antioxidant activity with respect to the compounds without this group, but the presence of a prenyl group improved the antioxidant activity. This effect had already been observed in our previous work35.

 

Table 4. Screening results of DPPH radical scavenging activity
of precursors 4-9 and prenylated derivatives 1, 11-15.

Antioxidant activity is shown as IC50 values in μM concentrations;
NA = no activity; >100 = IC50 value over 100 μM. All compounds
were analyzed in triplicate and the results expressed as average ±
standard deviation.

 

4. CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a one-step synthesis of prenylated acetophenone and benzaldehyde derivatives using ZnCl2 as a Lewis acid catalyst in ethyl acetate. This methodology does not require complex reaction conditions and has a relatively simple work-up procedure and good yields based on unrecovered aromatic starting material.

Prenylation affects the properties of the basic skeletons. Prenylated acetophenone and benzaldehyde derivatives could serve as useful compounds for the development of alternative antimicrobial pesticides.

We found that benzaldehyde 15 with catecholic hydroxyl groups had an IC50 value of 27.20 μM close to Trolox's IC50 value. Thus, this type of substitution should be considered to synthesize antioxidant compounds. The introduction of a prenyl group increases the radical scavenging activity of the precursors 6 and 9.

Among the tested pathogens, P. syringae and G. fujikuroi were the most sensitive to the synthesized compounds. Among the compounds tested, compound 15 stands out for its antimicrobial capacity with inhibition percentages close to 89 % (250 μM) and 100% (1000 μM), respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge support by FONDECYT (grant No. 1130924) and the Dirección General de Investigación, Innovación y Postgrado (DGIIP) of the Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María.

Supplementary Material

Request for supplementary information to the corresponding author, mauricio.osorio@usm.cl

 

REFERENCES

1. N. Edayadulla, P. A. Ramesh, Nat. Prod. Commun. 7, 1325 (2012)        [ Links ]

2. M.E. Sánchez-Mendoza, J. Rodríguez-Silverio, J.F. Rivero-Cruz, H.I. Rocha-González, J.B. Pineda-Farías, J. Arrieta, Fitoterapia 87, 11 (2013)        [ Links ]

3. B. Sontag, N. Arnold, W. Steglich, T. Anke, J. Nat. Prod. 62, 1425 (1999)        [ Links ]

4. R.K. Mayaka, M.K. Langat, J.O. Omolo, P.K. Cheplogoi, Planta Med. 78, 383 (2012)        [ Links ]

5. E. Jiménez, F. Dorta, C. Medina, A. Ramírez, I. Ramírez, H. Peña-Cortés, Mar. Drugs 9, 739 (2011).         [ Links ]

6. W. El Khoury, K. Makkouk, J. Plant Pathol., 92 (4, Supplement), S4.35 (2010)        [ Links ]

7. B. Williamson, B. Tudzynski, P. Tudzynski, J.A.L. Van Kan, Mol. Plant Pathol. 8, 561 (2007)        [ Links ]

8. E.G. Wulff, J.L. S0rensen, M. Lübeck, K.F. Nielsen, U. Thrane, J. Jan Torp, Environ. Microbiol. 12, 649 (2010)        [ Links ]

9. G. Sepúlveda-Chavera, R. Salvatierra-Martínez, C. Bilbao-Apata, P. Sepúlveda-Ramírez, M. Allende-Castro, J. Alache-González, IDESIA (Chile), 31, 41 (2013)        [ Links ]

10. L. Gallo, F. Siverio, A.-M. Rodríguez-Pérez, Ann. Appl. Biol. 150, 65 (2007)        [ Links ]

11. Ozone Secretariat United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Handbook for the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 8th ed.; Secretariat for The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer & The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009; pp. 291-292.         [ Links ]

12. CODEX ALIMENTARIUS International Food Standards. http://www.codexalimentarius.org/about-codex/en/. (accessed on 26 January 2016).         [ Links ]

13. M. Guo, A. Block, C.D. Bryan, D.F. Becker, J.R. Alfano, J. Bacteriol. 194, 5054 (2012)        [ Links ]

14. R. Prajapat, A. Marwal, P.N. Jha, Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2, 83 (2013)        [ Links ]

15. L.W. Moore, J.W. Pscheidt, Diseases Caused by Pseudomonas syringae. http://pnwhandbooks.org/plantdisease/node/1814/print. (accessed on 26 January 2016)        [ Links ]

16. C. Hoarau, T.R.R. Pettus, Synlett 1, 127 (2003)        [ Links ]

17. O Talhi, A.M.S. Silva, Curr. Org. Chem. 17, 1067 (2013)        [ Links ]

18. S.R. Ravada, L.R. Emani, M.R. Garaga, B. Meka, T. Golakoti, Am. J. Infect. Dis. 5, 83 (2009)        [ Links ]

19. S.N. Fedorov, O.S. Radchenko, L.K. Shubina, N.N. Balaneva, A.M. Bode, V.A. Stonik, Z. Dong, Pharm. Res. 23, 70 (2006)        [ Links ]

20. Z. Wang, Y. Cao, S. Paudel, G. Yoon, S.H. Cheon, Arch. Pharm. Res. 36, 1432 (2013).         [ Links ]

21. J.-J. Helesbeux, O. Duval, D. Guilet, D. Séraphin, D. Rondeau, P. Richomme, Tetrahedron 59, 5091 (2003)        [ Links ]

22. M.P. Neves, R.T. Lima, K. Choosang, P. Pakkong, M. de S.J. Nascimento, M.H. Vasconcelos, M. Pinto, A.M.S. Silva, Cidade, H. Chem. Biodivers. 9, 1133 (2012)        [ Links ]

23. X. Dong, Y. Wang, T. Liu, P. Wu, J. Gao, J. Xu, B. Yang, Y. Hu, Molecules 16, 8257 (2011)        [ Links ]

24. A.C. Jain, R.C. Gupta, P.D. Sarpal, Tetrahedron 34, 3563 (1978)        [ Links ]

25. V.P. Pathak, R.N. Khanna, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 55, 2264 (1982)        [ Links ]

26. W. Reininger, A. Hartl, Method of acylation of phloroglucinol. US patent 4,053,517, filed 5 May 1976, issued 11 October 1977.         [ Links ]

27. D. Ahmed, M.M. Khan, R. Saeed, Antioxidants 4, 394 (2015)        [ Links ]

28. T.P.T. Cushnie, A.J. Lamb, Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 38, 99 (2011)        [ Links ]

29. M. Daglia, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 174 (2012)        [ Links ]

30. H. Naeimi, A. Amini, M. Moradian, Org. Chem. Front. 1, 415 (2014)        [ Links ]

31. E. Bálint, O. Kovács, L. Drahos, Keglevich, G. Lett. Org. Chem. 10, 330 (2013)        [ Links ]

32. M. Vandewalle, Bol. Soc. Chim. Belg. 70, 163 (1961)        [ Links ]

33. S. Alam, J. Miah, A. Islam, J. Biol. Sci. 4, 527 (2004)        [ Links ]

34. L.Y. Zhao, Y.L. Li, Chin. Chem. Lett. 5, 1009 (1994)        [ Links ]

35. M. Osorio, J. Aravena, A. Vergara, L. Taborga, E. Baeza, K. Catalán, C. González, M. Carvajal, H. Carrasco, L. Espinoza, Molecules 17, 556 (2012)        [ Links ]

36. M.D. Cole, Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 22, 837 (1994)        [ Links ]

37. I.C. Zampini, M.A. Vattuone, M.I. Isla, J. Ethnopharmacol. 102, 450 (2005)        [ Links ]

38. P. Cos, A.J. Vlietinck, D.V. Berghe, L. Maes, J. Ethnopharmacol. 106, 290 (2006)        [ Links ]

39. P.S. McManus, V.O. Stockwell, G.W. Sundin, A.L. Jones, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 443 (2002).         [ Links ]

40. S. Riggoti, K. Gindro, H. Richter, O. Viret, FEMSMicrobiol. Lett. 209, 169 (2002)        [ Links ]

41. T. Bekker, N. Labuschagne, C. Kaiser, S. Afr. Avocado Grow. Assoc. Yearb 28, 60 (2005)        [ Links ]

42. M. Horta, N. Sousa, A.C. Coelho, D. Neves, A. Cravador, Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 73, 48 (2008)        [ Links ]

43. M. Azor, J. Gené, J. Cano, D.A. Sutton, A.W. Fothergill, M.G. Rinaldi, J. Guarro, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 2228 (2008)        [ Links ]

44. R. Salzman, I. Tikhonova, B. Bordelon, P. Hasegawa, R. Bressan, Plant Physiol. 117, 465 (1998)        [ Links ]

45. S.I. Kirubakaran, S.M. Begum, K. Ulaganathan, N. Sakthivel, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46, 918 (2008)        [ Links ]

46. G. Zhu, F. Huang, L. Feng, B. Qin, Y. Yang, Y. Hen, X. Lu, Agric. Sci. China 7, 831 (2008)        [ Links ]

47. M. Meepagala, G. Sturtz, G. Wedge, J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 6989 (2002)        [ Links ]

48. H. Alizadeh, A. Sharifi-Tehrani, G. Hedjaroude, Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 72, 795 (2007)        [ Links ]

49. W. Steck, Can. J. Chem. 49, 1197 (1971)        [ Links ]

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License